Because of the very tight timeframe given, Our observations are limited to what our committee considered the most urgent and important issues to be dealt with. On the one hand, under the present interpretation of the Regulation (and therefore of the Directive), the Design law in the EU is unsatisfactory.
BNA
Belgian National Association for the Protection of Industrial Property (AIPPI Belgium Group)
Academic / research · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 874714434618-29
2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 140 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #59 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2019
in the register since
Declares membership of
- I'm member of the European Institute of patent attorneys: https://patentepi.org/en/
- I'm member of the Belgian Institute of patent attorneys: https://economie.fgov.be/en/themes/intellectual-property/ins…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Head office
- Brussel, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Belgian in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Belgian National Association for the Protection of Industrial Property (AIPPI Belgium Group)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Belgian National Association for the Protection of Industrial Property (AIPPI Belgium Group) filed 2 positions on 27 Jan 2023, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Because of the very tight timeframe given, these observations are limited to what our committee considered the most urgent and important issues to be dealt with. On the one hand, under the present interpretation of the Regulation (and therefore of the Directive), the Design law in the EU is unsatisfactory.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Belgian National Association for the Protection of Industrial Property (AIPPI Belgium Group) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 13.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Belgian National Association for the Protection of Industrial Property (AIPPI Belgium Group)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.