Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
BUN

Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer

Industry association · Germany · EU Transparency Register 25412265365-88

4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #71 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

6.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since

Declares membership of

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Head office
Berlin, Germany
EU office
Brüssel

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 4 files, from Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer filed 4 positions between 4 May 2021 and 25 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.

2021 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

28th regime corporate legal framework – EU Inc.filed 25 Jun 2026PDFsource

In principle, the Federal Bar Association (Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer, BRAK) recognises the objective of creating a single, digital form of company for the European single market with EU Inc., in particular to promote start-ups across borders and strengthen the EU’s competitiveness.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Digital Markets Actfiled 4 May 2021PDFsource

Stellungnahme Nr. 35 April 2021 Registernummer: 25412265365-88 Digital Markets Act – Opinion of BRAK Mitglieder des Ausschusses Kartellrecht RAin Dr. Ellen Braun, LL.M. (Berichterstatterin) RA Dr. Matthias Karl, LL.M. RA Dr. Moritz Wilhelm Lorenz (Berichterstatter) RA Dr. Andreas Lotze RA Dr. Martin Schwarz RAin Dr. Dominique Wagener RA Dr.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material. Recastfiled 23 Apr 2024PDFsource

The Federal Bar Association gives its opinion on the European Commission’s proposal for a directive on combating sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children in the attached document. It warmly welcomes the intention of the proposal and the innovations it envisages in the field of prevention and education.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Implementing Regulation on the format for the submission of beneficial ownership information to the central registersfiled 23 Dec 2025PDFsource

see Annex The Federal Bar Association is the umbrella organisation for legal self-government. It represents the interests of the 28 bar associations and thus of the entire legal profession in the Federal Republic of Germany. I. Publication of comprehensive information on beneficial owners raises fundamental concerns.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 16.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.