Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ABA

Austrian Biomass Association

NGO · Austria · EU Transparency Register 419318247465-60

6
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 326 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #79 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Bioenergy Europe
  • World Bioenergy Association
  • Kompost & Biogas Verband
  • Umweltdachverband
  • Ökosoziales Forum
  • Österreichische Energieagentur
  • Erneuerbare Energie Österreich

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Österreichischer Biomasse-Verband (ÖBMV)
Head office
Wien, Austria

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Austrian in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Austrian Biomass Association? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Austrian Biomass Association engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 6 files, from Austrian Biomass Association or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Austrian Biomass Association filed 6 positions between 13 Oct 2025 and 2 Jun 2026, across 6 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.

2025 · 2 filed2026 · 4 filed

What they argued

Biotech Act IIfiled 2 Jun 2026PDFsource

Biotech Act II should avoid creating parallel sustainability systems or additional reporting frameworks that would duplicate current obligations. To meet climate targets on time, the pace of implementation must be accelerated, but this is being slowed down by lengthy administrative processes (regulatory procedures).

Revision of the EU’s energy security frameworkfiled 13 Oct 2025source

1. Europe’s self-reliance must prioritise its own security of supply. We cannot rely on new dependencies on partners such as the US or Canada. The ultimate goal remains to fully replace Russian energy imports and minimise the risk of political instrumentalisation by other suppliers. Massive energy imports also undermine the EU’s climate objectives, which can only be achieved with indigenous renewable energy sources.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Revision of national targets and flexibilities in the EU climate policy framework after 2030filed 29 Apr 2026PDFsource

While we consider the review of the post-2030 targets to be necessary, we call for a fundamental revision of the current LULUCF framework. Our key criticism is directed against a policy that prioritises forests as passive carbon pools rather than promoting active management and the associated avoidance of fossil emissions.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Land use, land use change and forestry – establishing trajectories towards 2030filed 10 Dec 2025source

The revised Regulation (EU) 2018/841 (LULUCF) introduces new binding targets for Member States to generate additional land-based removals by 2030. The target is unrealistic and is increasingly becoming a burden on the forestry industry. In some countries, such as Austria, Germany, and Luxembourg, timber stocks per hectare have already reached saturation point and cannot be increased further.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 136.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Austrian Biomass Association’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.