ADEME, the French Agency for Ecological Transition, thanks and supports the EU Commission in the SFDR review. ADEME has already published a position paper regarding the need of SFDR review, annexed to the current answer. The recent Omnibus proposals regarding CSRD and Taxonomy frameworks have a direct impact on SFDR, but the core messages remain.
ADEME
Other · France
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track ADEME in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ADEME? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ADEME filed 3 positions between 18 Mar 2022 and 28 May 2025, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
• Prohibit planned obsolescence practices by using the definition that exists in French legislation: The practice of planned obsolescence, which is defined by the use of techniques, including software, whereby the person responsible for placing a product on the market is intended to deliberately reduce its lifespan, shall be prohibited.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
CONTRIBUTION FOR DELEGATED ACT ON BATTERIES CARBON FOOTPRINT Rules for electricity modelling 24/05/2024 Contributors: Caroline Mir, Pierre Sacher ADEME The delegated acts purpose, amongst others, is to provide the best information to the consumers and to foster low carbon European battery production.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ADEME next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 6.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ADEME’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.