Rules on authorisations for the planting and replanting of vineyards and on the functioning of the analytical databank
1 submissions from 1 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission received 3 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 1 from organizations. Not shown: 2 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. About this data →
Who showed up
0 submissions from industry and none from civil society organizations; 1 from public authorities, academia and others.
Industry 0Civil society 0Public authorities, academia, other 1
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 3 Sept 2026 — it ran from 6 Aug 2026.
Policy area
Agriculture (DG AGRI)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2026
How it got here
Reg del draft3 Sept 2026
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Reg del.
First of all, the Agricultural Law Department of the Office of the Lower Austrian Provincial Government would like to thank you for the opportunity to submit an opinion on the draft Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/273 as regards the scheme of vine planting authorisations and the functioning of the analytical database for isotopic data in the wine sector.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
