INVESTIMENTI Importante prevedere, a determinate condizioni, l’acquisto di animali, in particolare capi bovini e suini da riproduzione. La percentuale massima dell’importo dei costi ammissibili, pari al 30 % per l’acquisto di animali da riproduzione deve essere innalzata al 50%. Sempre per gli investimenti, è importante prevedere l’applicazione dei Costi standard.
EU consultation
Review of Agricultural State aid Guidelines
5 submissions from 5 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 196 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 5 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
2 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 2Civil society 3Public authorities, academia, other 0
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 19 Jul 2019 — it ran from 26 Apr 2019.
- Policy area
- Agriculture (DG AGRI)
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Commission reference
- C(2022)9120
How it got here
- Impact assess incep27 Feb 2019
- Public consultation19 Jul 2019
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Swd, Communication, Act.
Showing 5 of 5 submissions.
TC
The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK)
· · filed 27 Feb 2019 · source
Helsinki, the 27th of February 2019 Feedback on the European Commission inception impact assessment: Review of Agricultural State aid Guidelines and Review of the Agricultural Block Exemption Regulation The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) welcomes the European Commission initiative to review the Agricultural State aid Guidelines and the Agricultural Block Exemption Regulation (ABER).
DB
Deutscher Bauernverband
· · filed 25 Feb 2019 · source
The German Farmers’ Association supports the Commission’s approach to further simplify state aid rules and make controls more efficient. The new funding period should be used to revise and adapt the content of the state aid rules in the agricultural and forestry sectors and rural areas.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Confederation of European Forest Owners (CEPF) welcomes the European Commission initiative to review the Agricultural State aid Guidelines and the Agricultural Block Exemption Regulation (ABER). CEPF considers that consistency and continuity between the CAP Strategic Plans regulation and future State aids Guidelines are essential for the forest sector, which is known for long-term actions and over-generational…
SC
Senior Corporate Silver Spoon Environment and Nature Association
· · filed 18 Feb 2019 · source
Dear Commission, I've read the roadmap for my part. Which is called Review of Agricultural State Aid Guidelines. During the reading of Section „A” my suggestion has already been developed and I will present this proposal as an initiative to develop a new legal framework for the CAP in the future. First as a Landscape Management Engineer, I was thinking about the different and expected effects.
Take the dataCSV — all 5 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.