IEEP's feedback to the European Commission's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism proposal The European Commission’s proposal for a European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) was released on 14 July 2021 as part of the Fit-For-55 legislative package aiming to achieve a 55% reduction in EU’s GHG emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels.
IEE
Institute for European Environmental Policy
Environmental organization · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 934329423960-72
6
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 665 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 163 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #34 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Climate Action Network Europe (CAN Europe) - http://www.caneurope.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Institute in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Institute for European Environmental Policy? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Institute for European Environmental Policy filed 6 positions between 4 Mar 2020 and 16 Sept 2025, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
2020 · 1 filed2021 · 3 filed2025 · 2 filed
What they argued
The IEEP welcomes the proposed EU net 90% emissions reduction target for 2040 while expressing concern regarding key elements that diverge from the Commissions recommendation for the target from February 2024, notably the incorporation of international credits and the absence of distinct targets for emission reductions and carbon removals.
IEEP’s response to the public consultation ‘Batteries - modernising EU rules’ 1 March 2021 | IEEP welcomes the opportunity to submit its opinion to the European Commission’s public consultation survey. The consultation survey covers the proposed regulation concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
IEEP welcomes the Roadmap as an acknowledgement that the European Commission needs to address deforestation and forest degradation through legislative measures. We also welcome the recognition that the EU is a major importer of agricultural commodities and therefore part of the problem, but also part of the solution to reduce global deforestation.
The reduction of red tape and the increase of flexibility, for both farmers and Member States, can contribute to simplifying CAP implementation, as well as enhancing the competitiveness and resilience of farms in the EU.
IEEP welcomes the new GSP proposal, yet, we identify key areas in need of more concrete provisions to ensure environmental protection and the promotion of more sustainable trade. Consult the attached document for detailed feedback.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Institute for European Environmental Policy next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 102.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Institute for European Environmental Policy’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.