Cruelty Free Europe thanks for the Commission for the opportunity to provide comments on the EU GLP Directives, an invaluable tool for ensuring the quality and reliability of data used for regulatory decision-making.
EU consultation
Evaluation of the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Directives
9 submissions from 9 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 24 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 9 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
6 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 27 Jun 2025 — it ran from 14 Mar 2025.
- Policy area
- Industry (DG GROW)
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Adoption expected
- 31 Dec 2026 · in 123 days
How it got here
- Call for evidence · evaluation27 Jun 2025
- Public consultation27 Jun 2025
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Evl.
9 positions
Based on own academic work, analyses, and observations, in my opinion, the current implementation of GLP in the EU does not effectively prevent misleading data analyses, exclusion of datasets from study reports, and withholding of entire studies, and does not stringently follow up on bad practices when these are detected. Also, there is a lack of transparency regarding GLP violations.
CONFAPI- Confederazione Italiana della Piccola e Media Industria Privata
· · filed 27 Jun 2025 · source
Confapi, Confederazione Italiana della Piccola e Media Industria Privata, accoglie con favore l'iniziativa della Commissione europea di avviare una valutazione approfondita delle Direttive 2004/9/CE e 2004/10/CE in materia di Buone Pratiche di Laboratorio (BPL).
Research Quality Assurance - GLP Committee
· · filed 27 Jun 2025 · source
Directives 2004/9/EC and 2004/10/EC have improved the reliability and consistency of safety data across the EU by harmonizing Good Laboratory Practice standards and adopting the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice. This has increased efficiency, reduced duplicate studies, and enabled mutual recognition of data between member states.
As a large multinational company, BASF operates several fully Good Laboratory Practice compliant Test Facilities in Europe with a focus on chemicals, crop protection including seeds and traits and toxicology. Size of the Test Facilities is up to several hundred employees, with some facilities operating in addition to GLP under other quality systems, eg. ISO norms.
EFPIA - European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
· · filed 2 Jun 2025 · source
EFPIA welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Call for Evidence regarding the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) framework. From our perspective, the current GLP directive and the existing framework are functioning well and continue to support high-quality non-clinical studies across the EU. EFPIA finds that the GLP principles as defined by the OECD are both relevant and value-adding.
Miller International Knowledge (MIK)
· · filed 23 Mar 2025 · source
Feedback from Miller International Knowledge (MIK) As an interdisciplinary organization focused on legal compliance, ethics, and responsible innovation in science and technology, Miller International Knowledge (MIK) welcomes the opportunity to provide input on the evaluation of Directives 2004/9/EC and 2004/10/EC on Good Laboratory Practice (GLP).
ETH Zurich
· · filed 22 Mar 2025 · source
The evaluation of the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Directives is a timely and important initiative. In an era where chemical safety, environmental protection, and human health are under increasing scrutiny, ensuring the reliability and credibility of chemical testing data is critical.
Swift Consulting - Laurence Guillosson
· · filed 18 Mar 2025 · source
As a pesticide regulatory affairs specialist, GLP is THE most important certification that I look for in a laboratory. Next is the country where the laboratory is located because all GLP-certifying National bodies are as unbiased, competent or thorough as they should be.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.