Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Evaluation of the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Directives

9 submissions from 9 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 24 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 9 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

6 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 6Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 2

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 27 Jun 2025 — it ran from 14 Mar 2025.

Policy area
Industry (DG GROW)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2026 · in 123 days

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · evaluation27 Jun 2025
  2. Public consultation27 Jun 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Evl.

9 positions

CF

Cruelty Free Europe

· · filed 27 Jun 2025 · source

PDF

Cruelty Free Europe thanks for the Commission for the opportunity to provide comments on the EU GLP Directives, an invaluable tool for ensuring the quality and reliability of data used for regulatory decision-making.

LinkedInX
SU

Stockholm University

· · filed 27 Jun 2025 · source

PDF

Based on own academic work, analyses, and observations, in my opinion, the current implementation of GLP in the EU does not effectively prevent misleading data analyses, exclusion of datasets from study reports, and withholding of entire studies, and does not stringently follow up on bad practices when these are detected. Also, there is a lack of transparency regarding GLP violations.

LinkedInX
CC

CONFAPI- Confederazione Italiana della Piccola e Media Industria Privata

· · filed 27 Jun 2025 · source

PDF

Confapi, Confederazione Italiana della Piccola e Media Industria Privata, accoglie con favore l'iniziativa della Commissione europea di avviare una valutazione approfondita delle Direttive 2004/9/CE e 2004/10/CE in materia di Buone Pratiche di Laboratorio (BPL).

LinkedInX
RQ

Research Quality Assurance - GLP Committee

· · filed 27 Jun 2025 · source

Directives 2004/9/EC and 2004/10/EC have improved the reliability and consistency of safety data across the EU by harmonizing Good Laboratory Practice standards and adopting the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice. This has increased efficiency, reduced duplicate studies, and enabled mutual recognition of data between member states.

LinkedInX
BS

BASF SE

· · filed 5 Jun 2025 · source

As a large multinational company, BASF operates several fully Good Laboratory Practice compliant Test Facilities in Europe with a focus on chemicals, crop protection including seeds and traits and toxicology. Size of the Test Facilities is up to several hundred employees, with some facilities operating in addition to GLP under other quality systems, eg. ISO norms.

LinkedInX
EE

EFPIA - European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations

· · filed 2 Jun 2025 · source

EFPIA welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Call for Evidence regarding the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) framework. From our perspective, the current GLP directive and the existing framework are functioning well and continue to support high-quality non-clinical studies across the EU. EFPIA finds that the GLP principles as defined by the OECD are both relevant and value-adding.

LinkedInX
MI

Miller International Knowledge (MIK)

· · filed 23 Mar 2025 · source

Feedback from Miller International Knowledge (MIK) As an interdisciplinary organization focused on legal compliance, ethics, and responsible innovation in science and technology, Miller International Knowledge (MIK) welcomes the opportunity to provide input on the evaluation of Directives 2004/9/EC and 2004/10/EC on Good Laboratory Practice (GLP).

LinkedInX
EZ

ETH Zurich

· · filed 22 Mar 2025 · source

The evaluation of the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Directives is a timely and important initiative. In an era where chemical safety, environmental protection, and human health are under increasing scrutiny, ensuring the reliability and credibility of chemical testing data is critical.

LinkedInX
SC

Swift Consulting - Laurence Guillosson

· · filed 18 Mar 2025 · source

As a pesticide regulatory affairs specialist, GLP is THE most important certification that I look for in a laboratory. Next is the country where the laboratory is located because all GLP-certifying National bodies are as unbiased, competent or thorough as they should be.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 9 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.