The civic association Chceme zdravú krajinu ("hereinafter referred to as "Association") submits the following comments within the frame of call for evidence regarding the Radioactive Waste Directive (2011/70/Euratom) and the Shipment Directive (2006/117/Euratom).
EU consultation
Evaluation of Radioactive Waste Directive and Shipment Directive
23 submissions from 22 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 56 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 23 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
8 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 8 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 19 Jun 2026 — it ran from 27 Mar 2026.
- Policy area
- Energy (DG ENER)
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Adoption expected
- 31 Dec 2026 · in 123 days
How it got here
- Call for evidence · evaluation19 Jun 2026
- Public consultation19 Jun 2026
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Report.
23 positions
Obec Hodov
· · filed 19 Jun 2026 · source
The comments of the municipality of Hodov in the context of the European Commission’s public consultation on the evaluation and possible revision of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, the municipality of Hodov, as one of the municipalities concerned by the site search process for the deep radioactive waste…
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Zdravý domov Vysočina
· · filed 19 Jun 2026 · source
Hello, on behalf of Healthy Homes Vysočina, I would like to draw attention to the huge discrepancy between the Euroatom Directive and the European taxonomy.While Euroatom allows for more options for the management of high-level radioactive waste,taxonomy forces the Czech Republic to build a deep repository by 2050.A no matter if there is no need at that time.It is a nonsensical condition here that only with the deep…
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Nucleareurope, the Brussels-based Association representing the European nuclear industry, welcomes the European Commissions evaluation of the two core Euratom instruments governing radioactive waste management and shipments. From the perspective of the European nuclear industry, both Directives remain fit for purpose.
We, the 12 undersigned European environmental NGOs, welcome the opportunity to submit our suggestions for amending the Nuclear Waste Directive. This Directive is per se a valuable driver for improvement of the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste in the EU, but it has some shortcomings.
DeegGEO Finland
· · filed 19 Jun 2026 · source
In DeepGEO Finlands opinion both the existing radioactive Waste Directive and Shipment Directive remain effective overall. However, there are some areas which would benefit from being updated. For the Waste Directive, the whereas section might note more recent developments such as: - the EU HARPERS project (concluded 2025) and its main findings.
The European Association of National Metrology Institutes (EURAMET) is the Regional Metrology Organisation (RMO) of Europe with 38 member countries. It promotes European co-operation in the field of metrology for the development and application of measurement science and standards, and a globally recognised measurement infrastructure.
CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD NUCLEAR
· · filed 19 Jun 2026 · source
Experience gained in the implementation of Council Directive 2006/117/Euratom has identified a number of operational and regulatory challenges that may affect the efficiency and consistency of its application across Member States: Difficulties in meeting the timeframes established by the Directive, mainly due to delays in the exchange and processing of documentation between competent authorities of different Member…
The Municipality of Temelín, represented by its lawyer, submits JUDr. Michale Bernardo this contribution to the European Commission via the Have Your Say portal in the context of the public consultation on the evaluation of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom and Council Directive 2006/117/Euratom.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
European Association of Nuclear Medicine
· · filed 18 Jun 2026 · source
As the largest non-profit medical organisation dedicated to nuclear medicine in Europe and bringing together nuclear medicine professionals from a range of medical specialties, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine appreciates the opportunity to give input through this consultation.
For CFE Energies, the evaluation of the Euratom directives on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste must be an opportunity to go beyond a strictly administrative approach and reaffirm a long-term, responsible, solidarity-based and democratic European vision.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The comments of the municipality of Rudíkov in the context of the European Commission’s public consultation on the evaluation and possible revision of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, Municipality of Rudíkov, as one of the municipalities concerned by the site search process for the deep radioactive waste…
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
We welcome the opportunity to comment as part of the ongoing evaluation of Directive 2011/70/Euratom (the Directive). The Directive is in itself a valuable tool for improving the management of spent nuclear fuel (SWF) and radioactive waste in the EU, but it has significant shortcomings in its practical application, as experience in the Czech Republic shows.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
This document constitutes the position paper of the EDF Group submitted in response to the European Commissions call for evidence regarding the Radioactive Waste Directive (2011/70/Euratom) and the Shipment Directive (2006/117/Euratom).
IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it
· · filed 31 May 2026 · source
The initiative will assess: Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and Council Directive 2006/117/Euratom on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel. The only way to avoid risks with nuclear waste is not to produce it.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
XPEI Consulting
· · filed 26 May 2026 · source
Contribution to the Evaluation of Directive 2011/70/Euratom Stakeholder: Dr. Xavier Poteau, Senior Consultant (XPEI Innovation & Extreme Environments). Profile: Independent Senior Consultant with over 20 years of international experience in high-tech constraint sectors, including technical management at Sellafield Ltd (UK) and current role as freelance industrial consultant. 1.
This comment is submitted on behalf of NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark. NOAHs concerns regarding the Radioactive Waste Directive (2011/70/Euratom) and the Shipment Directive (2006/117/Euratom) are, among other things, related to the nuclear safety regulation process in the EU, transparency and public participation in the nuclear sector, how the Aarhus Convention is implemented, the role of the waste management…
Nuclear Medicine Europe
· · filed 24 Apr 2026 · source
Nuclear Medicine Europe represents the nuclear medicine and radiopharmaceutical sector, which annually benefits over 10 million European patients through diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. We welcome this evaluation and emphasize that medical radioactive waste differs fundamentally from nuclear energy waste in volume, half-life, handling conditions, and risk profile.
Lifesaving nuclear medicine should be regulated with the same rigor as other nuclear activities, but not in the same way. For innovative radiopharmaceuticals, high safety standards can be maintained while reducing unnecessary system burden by applying a pragmatic, risk and exposure-based approach to radioactive waste management, grounded in low medical doses, low volumes, safe handling conditions, and real-world…
IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it
· · filed 23 Apr 2026 · source
Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and Council Directive 2006/117/Euratom on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel should require their safe and undetermined storage or recovery before resuming their production.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs
· · filed 23 Apr 2026 · source
The general framework established by the two texts is very favourable and contributes to the gradual establishment of minimum national frameworks within the Member States. They help to ensure an effective level of protection of humans and the environment against the potential impacts of radioactive substances and materials whose past and future use is certain, whether or not they are considered necessary for the…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
IRT Wrocław
· · filed 23 Apr 2026 · source
IRT Wrocław (Poland) The European Commission, in its document (COM(2024) 197 final), summarized the implementation of Directive 2011/70/EURATOM. However, this document ignores the issue of exporting radioactive waste to third countries, which can be implemented by EU countries (EC Recommendation 2008/956/Euratom). On average, approximately 40,000 m3 of radioactive waste is generated annually within the EU.
Fortum has submitted a response to the European Commission's public consultation on the review of the Radioactive Waste Directive (2011/70/Euratom) and the Shipments Directive (2006/117/Euratom). Drawing on nearly five decades of nuclear operations at the Loviisa Nuclear Power Plant, our position supports a targeted, evidence-based approach to any future amendments and highlights a specific definitional gap…
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.