Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
NFE

NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark

Environmental organization · Denmark

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track NOAH in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark filed 3 positions between 11 Sept 2025 and 24 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Update of the EU Arctic policyfiled 13 Mar 2026PDFsource

The Arctic possesses a unique ecosystem that is particularly vulnerable to human interventions and pollution, because it recovers very slowly. Certain Arctic areas are already threatened by (plans for) terrestrial mining as well as on-shore and off-shore oil and gas extraction.

Legislative initiative on CO2 transportation infrastructure and marketsfiled 11 Sept 2025PDFsource

CRITICAL EVIDENCE Feedback to the EU Call for evidence on CO2 transport infrastructure and markets In this contribution we want to highlight the following: # The CLIMATE EMERGENCY we all are situated in, and towards which CCS is proposed as a tool for mitigation. This will inform if CCS can be viewed as such. # THE FRAMING OF THE NARRATIVE of CCS and the political and public reception of it.

Evaluation of Radioactive Waste Directive and Shipment Directivefiled 24 Apr 2026PDFsource

This comment is submitted on behalf of NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark. NOAHs concerns regarding the Radioactive Waste Directive (2011/70/Euratom) and the Shipment Directive (2006/117/Euratom) are, among other things, related to the nuclear safety regulation process in the EU, transparency and public participation in the nuclear sector, how the Aarhus Convention is implemented, the role of the waste management…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 7.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.