Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation · Commission Proposal

Digitalisation of identity cards issued to EU citizens

5 submissions from 5 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 177 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 5 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

2 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 2Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 2

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 17 Jan 2025 — it ran from 22 Nov 2024.

Policy area
Justice (DG JUST)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Commission Proposal
Commission reference
COM(2024)671

How it got here

  1. Proposal for a regulation17 Jan 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

5 positions

E

Eurosmart

· · filed 17 Jan 2025 · source

PDF

Eurosmart welcomes the proposal to digitalize national identity cards, enhancing free movement within the EU/SAC Area and leveraging the EUDI Wallet introduced by the amendment to the eIDAS Regulation. However, Eurosmart identifies the following comments: 1.Security Aspects: The proposal lacks clarity on Digital Travel Credentials (DTCs) security aspects.

LinkedInX
PL

Pearle * - Live Performance Europe

· · filed 17 Jan 2025 · source

PDF

Pearle*- Live Performance Europe is the European federation regrouping through its members over 13,000 organisations and companies in the music, performing arts and live event sectors. Pearle* has taken note of the Commissions invitation to a call for feedback on its plans to present a proposal on the digitalisation of travel documents.

LinkedInX
C

CNA

· · filed 14 Jan 2025 · source

The CNA responds to this consultation by means of the CNA Tourism and Commerce, which represents businesses operating in the tourism sector throughout Italy and which contribute to the attractiveness and enhancement of the regions, making the following comments: 1.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EN

European Network of Business Travel associations

· · filed 13 Jan 2025 · source

PDF

BT4Europe welcomes the Commissions proposed regulation on the issuance of digital travel credentials (DTC). This has the potential to facilitate an enhanced travel experience for the many business travelers who cross our European borders each year.

LinkedInX
MD

Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestags

· · filed 3 Dec 2024 · source

The EU’s moves to digitalise personal identities are anxious to many people. This is due to the loss of trust of public institutions due to their abusive and sometimes corrupt behaviour during the so-called ‘corona pandemic’. At that time, cyber-surveillance methods were stepped up.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 5 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.