Action is needed to bring back ‘high-quality’ nature by restoring degraded ecosystems to enable nature to recover and to improve the health and resilience of our ecosystems, to turn the tide against biodiversity loss. WWF-CEE therefore welcomes the commitment to put forward a proposal for legally binding EU nature restoration targets.
WCE
WWF Central and Eastern Europe
NGO · Austria · EU Transparency Register 02019258940-59
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1107 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #496 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since
Declares membership of
- WWF is a global network operating in over 100 countries. Within the European Union, WWF has independent offices estab…
- The majority of WWF’s global activities related to EU policy are reported through the registration of the WWF Europea…
- WWF offices in the EU may also engage directly with EU institutions. As these offices are independent legal entities…
- Any information provided through this registration complements the information submitted under the registration of th…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Umweltorganisation WWF Central and Eastern Europe (WWF-CEE)
- Head office
- Vienna, Austria
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track WWF in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at WWF Central and Eastern Europe? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
WWF Central and Eastern Europe filed 3 positions between 18 Mar 2020 and 29 Oct 2021, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2020 · 2 filed2021 · 1 filed
What they argued
The Successful Wildlife Crime Prosecution in Europe (SWIPE) LIFE project welcomes the commitment of the European Commission to revise and improve the EU Action Plan Against Wildlife Trafficking and offers its assistance. Please find attached our feedback.
WWF CEE and WWF AUSTRIA greatly appreciate the European Union’s acknowledgement of wildlife trafficking as a serious threat to biodiversity and herewith submit the attached feedback to the Action Plan Evaluation, as Beneficiaries of the EU funded project LIFE for Danube Sturgeons and whith a specific regard to sturgeon species. kind regards [name removed] (WWF CEE) and [name removed] (WWF Austria)
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put WWF Central and Eastern Europe next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from WWF Central and Eastern Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.