not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
4
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 583 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at TECH IN France? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
TECH IN France filed 4 positions between 22 Nov 2017 and 18 Mar 2021, across 4 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
We welcome the ambitions of the European Commission’s proposal, which will help to strengthen the data economy, to the benefit of both businesses and the public sector. This proposal represents an opportunity to stimulate data sharing at the European Union level. In addition to our response to the previous European consultations, we would like to formulate in the attached document some additional elements.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The acceleration of the digital transformation in industry has led to the introduction of new information systems or bricks on existing systems, leading to increased potential vulnerabilities and more exposure to cyber attacks from all types of malicious actors (states, cyber criminals, hackers, etc.).
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Réponse à la consultation « Fairness in platform-to-business relations » I. Contexte général Dans le cadre de sa stratégie pour un marché unique numérique, la Commission européenne travaille sur l’opportunité d’une proposition législation relative à la loyauté dans les relations entre plateformes et entreprises utilisatrices.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 16 July 2020 on Privacy Shield reiterated the need for a high level of data protection requirements for citizens and economic operators, involving a review of data regimes vis-à-vis third countries.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put TECH IN France next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from TECH IN France’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.