Trade union · France · EU Transparency Register 477767645892-04not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 15 Oct 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track syndicat in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés? so we know who speaks for it.
syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés filed 2 positions between 5 May 2022 and 17 Jun 2024, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
The proposal may be interesting provided that it takes into account some of the existing elements and does not complicate the existing reporting. I refer to the attached file with comments and comments on the following points: — A stable and long-term framework — Taking into account the legal basis and subsidiarity — Identification of specific policy objectives — Reports, data collection methods and their processing…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The Regulation as drafted to date will be ineffective in some way to enable the Member States to meet the overall climate targets set out in the Fit For 55 package. When analysing the effectiveness of harvesting reduction, currently advocated, in order to achieve LULUCF’s stated targets, it can be seen that this option is not effective on the climate, even on the contrary, the effects will be: more unwanted GHG…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 21.
Everything on this page comes from syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.