Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
SPT

syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés

Trade union · France · EU Transparency Register 477767645892-04not in register snapshot

This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 30 Aug 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track syndicat in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés filed 2 positions between 5 May 2022 and 17 Jun 2024, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed

What they argued

Monitoring framework for resilient European forestsfiled 5 May 2022PDFsource

The proposal may be interesting provided that it takes into account some of the existing elements and does not complicate the existing reporting. I refer to the attached file with comments and comments on the following points: — A stable and long-term framework — Taking into account the legal basis and subsidiarity — Identification of specific policy objectives — Reports, data collection methods and their processing…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Report on the evaluation of the LULUCF Regulationfiled 17 Jun 2024source

The Regulation as drafted to date will be ineffective in some way to enable the Member States to meet the overall climate targets set out in the Fit For 55 package. When analysing the effectiveness of harvesting reduction, currently advocated, in order to achieve LULUCF’s stated targets, it can be seen that this option is not effective on the climate, even on the contrary, the effects will be: more unwanted GHG…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 21.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from syndicat des propriétaires forestiers privés’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.