Singapore is committed to being a constructive partner in supporting EU CBAM implementation in a business-conducive manner. In the attached document, Singapore has provided feedback on the following areas: (a) recognition and treatment of international carbon credits in CBAM levy deductions; (b) clarification on 5% materiality threshold; (c) proposed approach to facilitate emissions attribution and reporting; (d)…
Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry
Public authority · SGP
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Singapore in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry filed 2 positions between 25 Sept 2025 and 10 Jun 2026, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Singapore implements a carbon tax regime, and would like to propose how third country carbon pricing could be accounted for under a carbon tax regime. We have ongoing work with consultants examining how to factor our carbon tax into final CBAM levy calculation, to minimise exposure to double taxation on Singapore goods exported to the EU.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.