Regarding the carbon price paid in a third country, we hope the following aspects can be clarified: 1. Clarify the method for apportioning the carbon price at the third-country organization level to the product level: Most countries levy carbon prices based on installation-level emissions.
SCD
Shanghai E-Carbon Digital Technology Co., Ltd
Company · CHN
11
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Shanghai in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Shanghai E-Carbon Digital Technology Co., Ltd? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Shanghai E-Carbon Digital Technology Co., Ltd filed 11 positions between 4 Sept 2025 and 23 Sept 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
If other self-produced heat and electricity are input into the on-site self-produced heat and power process, should the emissions corresponding to the other self-produced heat/electricity be calculated? There are two examples: if there is a heat production process A in the facility, whose product is Heat 1, and a heat production process B, whose product is Heat 2, and if Heat 2 is input into heat production process…
If other self-produced heat and electricity are input into the on-site self-produced heat and power process, should the emissions corresponding to the other self-produced heat/electricity be calculated? There are two examples: If there is a heat production process A in the facility, whose product is Heat 1, and a heat production process B, whose product is Heat 2, and if Heat 2 is input into heat production process…
If other self-produced heat and electricity are input into the on-site self-produced heat and power process, should the emissions corresponding to the other self-produced heat/electricity be calculated? There are two examples: If there is a heat production process A in the facility, whose product is Heat 1, and a heat production process B, whose product is Heat 2, and if Heat 2 is input into heat production process…
If other self-produced heat and electricity are input into the on-site self-produced heat and power process, should the emissions corresponding to the other self-produced heat/electricity be calculated? There are two examples: If there is a heat production process A in the facility, whose product is Heat 1, and a heat production process B, whose product is Heat 2, and if Heat 2 is input into heat production process…
If other self-produced heat and electricity are input into the on-site self-produced heat and power process, should the emissions corresponding to the other self-produced heat/electricity be calculated? There are two examples: If there is a heat production process A in the facility, whose product is Heat 1, and a heat production process B, whose product is Heat 2, and if Heat 2 is input into heat production process…
If other self-produced heat and electricity are input into the on-site self-produced heat and power process, should the emissions corresponding to the other self-produced heat/electricity be calculated? There are two examples: If there is a heat production process A in the facility, whose product is Heat 1, and a heat production process B, whose product is Heat 2, and if Heat 2 is input into heat production process…
Regarding the calculation of heat and electricity, we have the following question: If other self-produced heat and electricity are input into the on-site self-produced heat and power process, should the emissions corresponding to the other self-produced heat/electricity be calculated?
The following aspects of the CBAM methodology remain unclear in practical implementation: 1. Clarify the calculation method for source flows in the production process and installation level: If an installation contains both balance-based and standard-based production processes, should the materials be calculated separately based on the production process method (balance-based and standard-based) when determining…
The following aspects of the CBAM methodology remain unclear in practical implementation: 1. Clarify the specific content included in the boundaries of production processes: Currently, the definition of the boundaries for each production process is not clear enough.
Regarding free allowances, we hope the following aspects can be clarified: 1. Clarify the granularity of free allowances: Specify whether free allowances are allocated to aggregated goods category or to individual CN code products, as this will inversely affect the granularity of production process division. 2.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 3 files in common
- ECOS · 3 files in common
- DigitalTrade4.EU · 3 files in common
- Bellona Europa · 3 files in common
- European Advanced Carbon and Graphite Materials Association · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 103.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Shanghai E-Carbon Digital Technology Co., Ltd’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.