Qualcomm welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions consultation on the future of digital networks in the EU. Qualcomm is a world leading wireless technology developer and chipset provider headquartered in San Diego, California.
QUA
Qualcomm
Company · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 00358442856-45
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1212 companies & groups on this site, they rank #454 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€4.5M+
declared costs / yr (floor)
3
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since
Declares membership of
- 4iP Council →
- EU5GAA
- American Chambers of Commerce in Europe
- AmCham EU
- Bitkom
- CERRE
- CODE
- DIGITALEUROPE →
- European Internet Forum (EIF)
- ERTICO
- Connect Europe →
- EUN Partnership / STEM Alliance
- and 8 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM (NASDAQ))
- Head office
- San Diego, United states
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Qualcomm in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Qualcomm? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Qualcomm filed 4 positions between 9 May 2022 and 10 Sept 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
2022 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Qualcomm welcomes the draft Chips Act 2.0 as an important step towards a more comprehensive, demand-driven and value-chain-based European semiconductor strategy. The first Chips Act mobilized investment, but Europe still faces dependencies, limited supply-chain visibility and difficulties scaling innovation. Europes competitiveness cannot be secured through manufacturing capacity alone.
Qualcomm welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions Call for Evidence on the review of the Chips Act and supports the development of a more ambitious, innovation-driven Chips Act 2. The current Chips Act mobilized political attention and major investment, establishing semiconductors as a strategic priority for Europe.
Qualcomm appreciates the opportunity to provide information on the issues the European Commission has raised in this call for evidence. We agree with the Commission that “intangible assets are the cornerstones of today’s economy.” We also share the view that “[s]tandardisation is a key contributor to industrial innovation and competitiveness” and that “[s]uccessful standards rest on cutting-edge technologies, which…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Qualcomm next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 25.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Qualcomm’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.