Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
PPS

Pro-PLUS S.A.

Company · Poland

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Pro-PLUS in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Pro-PLUS S.A.? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Pro-PLUS S.A. engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Pro-PLUS S.A. or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Pro-PLUS S.A. filed 2 positions between 3 Oct 2025 and 8 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and the list of Union harmonisation legislationfiled 3 Oct 2025PDFsource

I am a representative of a small company which produces medical devices in a technology known for many years, has been developed in the course of implementing the requirements of the MDD Directive into Polish regulations and is still being implemented under the MDR transitional period, with minor changes.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

Implementing rules regarding requirements to be met by notified bodiesfiled 8 Jan 2026source

The proposed changes address only part of the problems related to the functioning of notified bodies that medical device manufacturers face in practice. In particular, they do not resolve key issues concerning costs, timeliness of activities, and contractual relationships.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 26.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Pro-PLUS S.A.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.