Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
PPS

Pro-PLUS S.A.

Company · Poland

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Pro-PLUS in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Pro-PLUS S.A.

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Pro-PLUS S.A.? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Pro-PLUS S.A. filed 2 positions between 3 Oct 2025 and 8 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and the list of Union harmonisation legislationfiled 3 Oct 2025PDFsource

I am a representative of a small company which produces medical devices in a technology known for many years, has been developed in the course of implementing the requirements of the MDD Directive into Polish regulations and is still being implemented under the MDR transitional period, with minor changes.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

Implementing rules regarding requirements to be met by notified bodiesfiled 8 Jan 2026source

The proposed changes address only part of the problems related to the functioning of notified bodies that medical device manufacturers face in practice. In particular, they do not resolve key issues concerning costs, timeliness of activities, and contractual relationships.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Pro-PLUS S.A. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 26.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Pro-PLUS S.A.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.