Privacy International welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commission’s proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence. Please see our submissions in the attached file.
Privacy International
NGO · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 78180074927-85
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #477 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Formal membership:
- European Digital Righs (EDRi) https://edri.org/
- IFEX https://ifex.org
- Informal membership/coalitions:
- Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) https://tacd.org/ (PI staff member is in the steering committee of this coali…
- Global Coalition for Tech Justice (GCTJ) https://yearofdemocracy.org/, informal coalition of CSOs
- CSO coalition on human rights and counter-terrorism
- https://www.humanrights-in-ct.org/
- informal coalition of CSOs
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- London, United kingdom
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Privacy in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Privacy International? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Privacy International filed 3 positions between 12 Mar 2021 and 31 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
Privacy International (PI) welcomes the aim of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) to address some of the challenges posed by the way the current digital markets operate. However, we believe that the proposal put forward by the European Commission in December 2020 contains some shortcomings that need to be addressed, if the DMA were to be effective in tackling these challenges.
Privacy International (PI) welcomes and thanks the Commission for the opportunity to provide feedback on this crucial guidance as part of the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). PI is a London-based NGO that researches and advocates globally against government and corporate abuses of data and technology. The full version of our feedback, containing more examples and info, is attached.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Privacy International next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 28.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Privacy International’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.