Finland would like to thank for the possibility to comment and in general, we are in favour of the revision of the pharmaceutical legislation. The regulatory system should be sound and flexible, the legislative framework must not be too detailed, and the administrative burden must not be increased. It is important to make processes as streamlined and cost-effective as possible and to avoid inefficiency.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
Public authority · Finland
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Ministry in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Ministry of Social Affairs and Health? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health filed 4 positions between 26 Aug 2020 and 23 Dec 2025, across 4 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and the Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency fully support the Commission’s high ambitions for a toxic-free environment leading to zero pollution. We want to thank the Commission for the possibility to provide feedback regarding the Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) on the revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation.
Since its establishment, ELA has demonstrated added value, particularly in facilitating cooperation between Member States and helping to develop this cooperation. Going forward, ELAs activities should focus on areas where it provides the greatest added value to the Member States, mobile workers, and businesses.
Finland / Ministry of Social Affairs and Health thanks for the opportunity to comment on and mainly agrees with the Inception Impact Assessment. Yet, some topics merit a comment. A. Context, problem definition and subsidiarity check Finland notes that under the risk-based Solvency II framework it is a (re)insurer’s primary duty to maintain its own solvency in order to protect the policyholders’ and beneficiaries’…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Ministry of Social Affairs and Health next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 6.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Ministry of Social Affairs and Health’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.