Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
GZS

Gospodarska zbornica Slovenije

Industry association · Slovenia · EU Transparency Register 534557633187-53

10
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #346 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
< €10K
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • AIBI – Evropsko združenje za pekarstvo
  • AISE – Mednarodno združenje proizvajalcev mil, detergentov in drugih izdelkov za čiščenje ter vzdrževanje
  • AIC – Forum jadransko-jonskih gospodarskih zbornic
  • AIECE – Evropsko združenje neodvisnih inštitutov za ocenjevanje in napovedovanje konjunkture
  • CAEF – Evropsko združenje livarn
  • CAOBISCO – Evropsko združenje proizvajalcev konditorskih izdelkov
  • CEEMET – Evropsko združenje delodajalcev kovinske industrije
  • CEFIC – Svet evropske kemijske industrije
  • CEI-Bois – Evropska konfederacija lesne industrije
  • CEPA – Zveza evropskih združenj za zatiranje škodljivcev
  • CEPI – Evropski svet za nepremičninsko stroko
  • CEPMC – Evropsko združenje proizvajalcev gradbenih materialov
  • and 54 more

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Ljubljana, Slovenia

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Gospodarska in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Gospodarska zbornica Slovenije? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Gospodarska zbornica Slovenije engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 4 files, from Gospodarska zbornica Slovenije or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Gospodarska zbornica Slovenije filed 10 positions between 13 May 2025 and 5 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2025 · 9 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Revision of the benchmark values for free allocation of emission allowances (2026-2030)filed 5 Jun 2026PDFsource

The Green transition is a key development priority for Europe. Thus, according to the latest guidelines, emissions are to be reduced by 90% by 2040 and climate neutrality is to be achieved by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. The fact is that the starting points for decarbonisation were set under fundamentally different circumstances than those we are witnessing today, six years later and after three crises.

Qualified electronic archiving servicesfiled 2 Oct 2025source

On behalf of the members of the ICT Association at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia, we fully endorse the comment submitted by Associazione Nazionale Archivistica Italiana and express our strong support for their position (https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14751-Qualified-electronic-archiving-services/F33069918_en)

Qualified certificates for electronic signatures and electronic sealsfiled 13 May 2025source

Versions of ETSI standards and their compliance with the eIDAS Regulation The proposals for implementing acts reference ETSI standards that are relevant to individual trust services, while also amending the provisions outlined in those reference ETSI standards.

Qualified certificates for electronic signatures and electronic sealsfiled 13 May 2025source

Revised Requirements for HSMs used by Trust Service Providers (TSPs) The eIDAS Regulation does not specify particular requirements for Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) that Trust Service Providers (TSPs) must use, unlike the requirements for Qualified Signature Creation Devices (QSCDs). There is no doubt that the private cryptographic keys used by TSPs are protected with the highest level of security.

Qualified certificates for electronic signatures and electronic sealsfiled 13 May 2025source

Loosely defined standards for Key activation on HSMs certified under EUCC or EN 419221-5:2018 Protection profiles for Trust Service Provider cryptographic modules Part 5: Cryptographic module for Trust services Use of Private Keys Requires Authentication via HSM Mechanisms The use of private keys requires prior authentication through mechanisms provided by the Hardware Security Module (HSM).

Qualified certificates for electronic signatures and electronic sealsfiled 13 May 2025source

Qualified electronic seal creation devices: When held by a legal entity that is not a TSP The eIDAS Regulation and the published draft implementing acts do not clarify the requirements for QSCD when such a device is used by a legal entity that is not a Trust Service Provider (TSP), and where the device is not operated as a remote QSCD.

Qualified certificates for electronic signatures and electronic sealsfiled 13 May 2025source

EPRELs new Legal entity identifier format vs ETSI EN 319 412-1 V1.5.1 As of 22 April 2025, the EPREL (European Product Registry for Energy Labelling) requires that identifiers for legal entities be provided in a different format than the one currently defined in ETSI EN 319 412-1 V1.5.1. The basis for the new format is the Regulation L_202400994SL.000101.fmx.xml.

Qualified certificates for electronic signatures and electronic sealsfiled 13 May 2025source

Transition periods in standards implementation/Lifecycle of standards: Implementing acts enter into force 20 days after publication. Existing systems cannot adapt that quickly. Therefore, whenever a change occurs, there must be a longer transition period to allow for proper implementation.

Sequential recording of data into qualified electronic ledgersfiled 3 Oct 2025source

On behalf of the members of the ICT Association at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia, we would like to comment on REQ-7.5-06. The provision defines security requirements only for cases where digital signature mechanisms are used, requiring certified secure cryptographic devices for private keys. However, no comparable requirements are set for other mechanisms.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 12.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Gospodarska zbornica Slovenije’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.