Company · CHL
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track EVoting in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EVoting? so we know who speaks for it.
EVoting filed 2 positions on 14 Jan 2026, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
There is legal uncertainty regarding the grounds for exclusion. We propose that the revision of the rules limit the ‘blocking’ of companies to cases of proven fraud, avoiding discrepancies in the interpretation of solvency documents issued by parent companies outside the EU (due to differences in format or national legislation) resulting in the exclusion of innovative European subsidiaries.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
We propose that the revision of the Directive clarify the obligation for contracting authorities to accept the technical and economic solvency of parent companies (including non-EU ones) automatically for newly created subsidiaries, provided that there is a commitment of availability of resources.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Everything on this page comes from EVoting’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.