EUROM welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the targeted revision of the EU rules for medical devices (MDR) and in vitro diagnostics (IVDR). This revision should aim to reduce bureaucratic burdens, strengthen governance and accountability, lower costs, foster competition and innovation, support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), ensure consistency with horizontal legislation, and address future…
EUR
EUROM
Industry association · Germany · EU Transparency Register 585778511937-68
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1062 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2013
in the register since
Declares membership of
- FPP4EU Collaboration Platform: https://www.fpp4eu.eu/news-and-events/events/
- Umbrella Project
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Federation of High-tech Industries (eurom)
- Head office
- Berlin, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track EUROM in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EUROM? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
EUROM filed 2 positions between 6 Oct 2025 and 23 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
EUROM strongly supports the Europeans Commissions initiative to clarify procedural requirements and lay down uniform rules for the conformity assessment under the medical device and in-vitro-diagnostic regulatory frameworks.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put EUROM next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 26.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from EUROM’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.