There should be functional and system requirements. I cannot understand why operating systems are allowed where software can read all the files on the computer. Many IoT devices do not support HTTPS, this is not acceptable. Since higher requirements reduce speed of digitalization,a bonus should be given for the first complying devices and OS. Main Focus is on devises helping in demand control.
effiziente.st
Company · Austria
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track effiziente.st in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at effiziente.st? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
effiziente.st filed 3 positions between 4 Sept 2024 and 10 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
ACER needs to step up in four areas where the EU internal energy market is visibly failing. Interconnectors enforce capacity targets and stop TSOs gaming the system. Energy communities implementation is a patchwork; harmonise grid fees and name non-compliant member states. Regulator independence too many NRAs are still too close to the incumbents they regulate; ACER should publish an annual independence index.
# Recommendations on Motor Efficiency and Transparency **Introduction** To promote the wider adoption of efficient motors and ensure long-term sustainability, regulation should emphasize not only compliance but also visibility of the efficiency class for users and bystanders, utility of the regulation, and effectiveness of the regulation also focusing on lifecycle impacts.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from effiziente.st’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.