he US muscled the EU into adopting Article 6 of the EU Copyright Directive, preventing reverse engineering in return for free trade. By implementing tariffs, the US broke that agreement. Theres no reason not to delete Article 6 of the EUCD, and all the other laws that prevent European companies from jailbreaking iPhones and making their own App Stores (minus Apples 30% commission), as well as ad-blockers for…
Edgar BV
Company · Netherlands
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Edgar in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Edgar BV? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Edgar BV filed 2 positions between 20 May 2025 and 13 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Allowing companies to close down IP addresses without clear recourse or proof is a terrible idea. DMCA has been weaponised and has resulted in content being taken down in an anti-competitive manner. Privacy Shield in Italy has resulted in huge blocks of the internet (and Google Drive!) being taken down. LaLiga has taken down innocent companies in Spain (including Cloudflare!).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Edgar BV’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.