Based on the current status, as seen from the field of consumption studies, we agree with the identified need to create more clarity within a very confusing area of legislation and labelling. However, it is paradoxical that reducing complexity is often met with a desire to introduce new schemes or strengthen existing schemes, such as in the area of product labelling.
CRN
Consumption Research Norway, OsloMet
Academic / research · Norway
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Consumption in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Consumption Research Norway, OsloMet? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Consumption Research Norway, OsloMet filed 2 positions on 31 Aug 2020, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
We want to express our enthusiasm for Empowering the consumer for the green transition initiative. Greenwashing as a marketing strategy, lack of correct information, as well as early and planned obsolescence are important barriers to address in transitioning to a more sustainable production and consumption system. We do however have some comments that we hope will be helpful in the further work, see enclosed file.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Consumption Research Norway, OsloMet next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 46.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Consumption Research Norway, OsloMet’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.