Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
NGO · Germany
Environmental organization · Belgium
Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2009
Guidance to facilitate the designation of renewables acceleration areas · Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Vernunftkraft e.V. · filed 8 Feb 2024 · source
We already consider the Directive on mandatory designation of acceleration areas (albeit fatal) for one or more technologies in the Member States by 21 February 2026. Each State has its own energy production priorities, such as France with the priority construction of nuclear power plants, and does not want to speed up the development of wind and solar installations at all.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
European Environmental Bureau · filed 23 Feb 2024 · source
The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) provides feedback to the European Commission on the upcoming guidance for Member States on designating Renewables Acceleration Areas (RAAs) under the revised EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED).
Vernunftkraft e.V. · filed 24 Mar 2020 · source
The targets of individual countries on the number of wind turbines are increasingly hampered by natural and environmental concerns. This is taken into account by national tightening and weakening of nature protection laws.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
European Environmental Bureau · filed 3 Apr 2020 · source
Access to justice is a widespread problem in the Member States and has been woefully insufficient also at EU level, as was also found by the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee. Overall, the EEB welcomes the initiative by the Commission to finally address some of the deficiencies around access to justice, but would like to draw attention to certain aspects that are elaborated in the attached document.
European Environmental Bureau · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source
The EEB welcomes the fact that the Commission has published its proposal to amend the Aarhus Regulation, with its stated intention to widen the opportunities to review decisions by the EU institutions that harm the environment. The proposal addresses a major obstacle to access to justice, namely the limitation of acts that may be challenged to measures of individual scope.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.