Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

SR
SESKO ry

NGO · Finland

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
DIG
DIGITALEUROPE

Industry association · Belgium

67
files engaged
of 583 tracked
78
positions filed
in those 583 files
26.7
declared FTE
self-declared
26
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €3.5M+ a year · in the register since 2011

Files both filed on (2)

Amending certain Regulations as regards digitalisation and common specifications (Omnibus IV) · European standards and European standardisation deliverables: decisions of European standardisation organisations

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Amending certain Regulations as regards digitalisation and common specifications (Omnibus IV)

SESKO ry · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

SESKO supports the European Commission's efforts to harmonise criteria for issuing common specifications. It is crucial that the future process is done in a way that ensures the involvement of a broad range of stakeholders. It is also important that there is a clear framework for the Commission's competences and for the possible withdrawal of common specifications.

DIGITALEUROPE · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

FINAL DRAFT – 29 AUGUST 2025 Less paper, more standards: The case for digitalisation and for repairing, not replacing, Europe’s standardisation system Executive summary The fourth omnibus proposal touches on two important areas for European industry: the digitalisation of product documentation – which can reduce burdens for companies and take forward Europe’s digital transformation – and the generalisation of common…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

European standards and European standardisation deliverables: decisions of European standardisation organisations

SESKO ry · filed 6 Apr 2022 · source

SESKO welcomes the proposed amendment of Regulation 1025/2012 which emphasizes the national delegation principle. SESKO has been a member of CENELEC since the establishment of CENELEC in 1973. The national delegation principle is at the heart of core values and working methods of CENELEC, based on a network of National Standardization Organizations in 34 countries across Europe, committed to engage a broad range of…

DIGITALEUROPE · filed 7 Apr 2022 · source

DIGITALEUROPE welcomes the recent publication of the European Commission’s EU Standardisation Strategy. We stand ready to support the Commission in leveraging global standards in support of a resilient, green and digital EU Single Market.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.