Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions considers that the Regulation should not apply to journeys by local and regional public transport, but only to long-distance journeys. For local and regional public transport, adequate passenger rights are generally available in the Member States.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Continuous improvement of travellers’ experience is a priority for the SNCF group, even beyond legal obligations. The Commission’s proposal for a regulation is therefore a priority issue. However, it comes in a context of a nascent market and must not prevent the emergence of new multimodal offers by creating an inadequate framework.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
SNCF welcomes the call of evidence which initiates the discussion on updating the current framework as for international capacity and traffic management. Need to have a network approach A network approach should be implemented (unlike the current corridor approach), providing RUs with a single point of contact (C-OSS).
The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) welcomes the overall objective of the European Commission, to enable more efficient use of railway infrastructure and rail capacity, and to increase European coordination.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.