Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

PSF
Plastic Soup Foundation

NGO · Netherlands

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
5.2
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2013

CHE
ChemSec

NGO · Sweden

10
files engaged
of 583 tracked
10
positions filed
in those 583 files
3
declared FTE
self-declared
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2011

Files both filed on (2)

Revision of EU rules on food contact materials · EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Revision of EU rules on food contact materials

Plastic Soup Foundation · filed 27 Jan 2021 · source

The Plastic Soup Foundation welcomes the decision of the EU to finally improve regulation on Food Contact Materials (FCM) to reduce the problems for human health and the environment. Hazardous chemicals, including hazardous plastic additives, must never be allowed in FCM in order to protect human health and the environment.

ChemSec · filed 29 Jan 2021 · source

ChemSec welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation on the roadmap for the Revision of EU rules on food contact materials (FCMs). We recognize and appreciate that the Commission in its roadmap identify a number of troubling issues that we believe urgently needs to be addressed. The most striking issue is that there is currently not a coherent system for regulation of substances of concern.

EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation

ChemSec · filed 19 Oct 2021 · source

We welcome the revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation and the proposed way forward presented in the roadmap. In our view the roadmap cover all necessary issues to be revised to make sure the Cosmetics regulation is in line with the aims and ambitions of the Chemical Strategy.

Plastic Soup Foundation · filed 1 Nov 2021 · source

Plastic Soup Foundation welcomes the proposed Roadmap and supports the Commission’s ambitions for a toxic-free environment leading to zero pollution. A revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation is needed to align with the aims and ambitions of the Chemical Strategy, and to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment against hazardous chemicals in cosmetics and encourage the development…

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.