Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

PS
PGNiG S.A.

Company · Poland

3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
5
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
EDF
EDF

Company · France

49
files engaged
of 583 tracked
52
positions filed
in those 583 files
7.3
declared FTE
self-declared
6
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €2M+ a year · in the register since 2009

Files both filed on (2)

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure · Methane emissions reduction in the energy sector

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

PGNiG S.A. · filed 4 May 2020 · source

GENERAL COMMENTS • Currently, transport sector accounts for a quarter of the UE’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and this value continues to grow. • Natural gas (LNG/CNG) powered vehicles reduce GHG emissions of approximately 20-22% (sum of CO2, CH4 and N2O) and produce three times less NOx compared to gasoline or diesel vehicles. LNG-fuelled ships emit up to 100% less PM, up to 80% less NOX and up to 100% less SOX.

PGNiG S.A. · filed 18 Nov 2021 · source

GENERAL COMMENTS • Defining compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) as transition phase fuels and limiting infrastructure commitments only to LNG and until 1 January 2025 may result in a time-limited support for these technologies and hamper the development not only of the bioLNG and bioCNG sector, but also projects developed for mixtures of hydrogen and natural gas.

EDF · filed 18 Nov 2021 · source

EDF welcomes the European Commission proposal for a Regulation on the deployment of alternative fuels, as part of the “fit for 55” package. The transport sector should indeed decrease its GHG emissions drastically to reach the renewed climate objectives enshrined within the EU Green Deal and carbon neutrality by 2050.

Methane emissions reduction in the energy sector

PGNiG S.A. · filed 26 Jan 2021 · source

GENERAL COMMENTS • EU legislation may lead to increased revenues, but also significant costs, for energy companies. However, to assess that, precise cost analyses must be conducted. Cost-efficiency should be at the heart of any policy planning. • All measures related to the reduction of methane emissions should be reasonable but not overly prescriptive to avoid excessive financial and technical burdens.

EDF · filed 26 Jan 2021 · source

According to latest IEA data, there were around 70 million tons of methane emitted to the atmosphere from oil and gas operations in 2020, this is broadly equivalent to total energy-sector emissions of the entire EU. EDF would like to highlight that the impact of methane is 30 times that of C02 on a 100 year time horizon, but it is ca. 85 times that of CO2 over a 20 year time span (1) .

PGNiG S.A. · filed 15 Apr 2022 · source

• Taking into account stringent obligations set out in Regulation, it is reasonable to set a 5 years deadline for full implementation the provisions of Regulation. • The „measurement” term should be replaced with „quantification” throughout the text of the regulation in order to allow additional instruments for better estimation of methane emissions. • The proposed term "component" in Article 2(8) is not defined.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.