Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Nuclear Transparency Watch calls on the European Commission to: 1 - Exclude nuclear energy from the EU Taxonomy due to its unsustainable and high-risk nature. 2 - Strengthen transparency by requiring verifiable, science-based evidence for all technical screening criteria. 3 - Enforce compliance with EU and Euratom laws on nuclear safety, waste management, and public participation.
Nucleareuropes response to this consultation focuses on the Technical Screening Criteria relating to the following economic activities: 4.26: Pre-commercial stages of advanced technologies to produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
Nucleareuropes response to this consultation focuses on the Technical Screening Criteria relating to the following economic activities: 4.26: Pre-commercial stages of advanced technologies to produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
Nuclear Transparency Watch is a European network of NGOs whose goal is to increase nuclear safety by supporting access to justice and access to information. NTW welcomes the Commission’s efforts to address the findings of EU non-compliance with the Convention by amending the Regulation with suitable measures.
EU environmental law – better access to justice FORATOM response to the Public Consultation FORATOM welcomes the opportunity to participate in the European Commission’s Roadmap [Ares (2020)1406501] and to contribute to the discussions on better access to justice in environmental matters. FORATOM wishes therefore to state the following observations: 1.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.