Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The Norwegian regulatory body welcomes the proposed Regulation on rail ticketing. In particular, the proposal could help address challenges relating to the market conditions for railway undertakings (RU). A specific regulation is essential to prevent potential market distortions arising from vertical integration between online ticketing service providers and RUs with a significant market presence.
The RATP group supports the objective pursued by the European Commission of facilitating travellers’ access to simpler, more readable, more multimodal and more sustainable mobility solutions. The possibility of searching for, comparing and reserving journeys combining several modes is an important lever for increasing the lattractivity of collective transport and encouraging a modal shift.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The RATP Group has developed unique historical expertise of a multimodal operator and is one of the world leaders in urban mobility. We operate on a daily basis 8 modes of transport in 14 countries, with a core activity in Ile-de-France, which includes in particular RER services provided on the French national rail network.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The Norwegian Railway Authority, as the national safety authority in Norway, refer to the Call for evidence for an impact assessment for improving mobility for train drivers. We can agree on the presented issues and recognise a need for more common rules. We welcome the initiative for an increase in the common requirements for driver-certification.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.