Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

EA
Eurogroup for Animals

NGO · Belgium

30
files engaged
of 583 tracked
32
positions filed
in those 583 files
9
declared FTE
self-declared
23
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2008

Files both filed on (2)

Medicinal products for human use · EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Medicinal products for human use

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health · filed 27 Apr 2021 · source

Finland would like to thank for the possibility to comment and in general, we are in favour of the revision of the pharmaceutical legislation. The regulatory system should be sound and flexible, the legislative framework must not be too detailed, and the administrative burden must not be increased. It is important to make processes as streamlined and cost-effective as possible and to avoid inefficiency.

Eurogroup for Animals · filed 8 Nov 2023 · source

Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the opportunity to comment on the revision of the EU general pharmaceuticals legislation for human use, offering its full support to measures which will ensure access to affordable and effective medicines for all. Our submission joins the efforts and aligns strongly with ICAPPP, including also some individual comments and recommendations.

EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation

Eurogroup for Animals · filed 29 Oct 2021 · source

Eurogroup for Animals welcomes this impact assessment with the purpose of reviewing some of the provisions of the Cosmetic Products Regulation in light of the objectives of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health · filed 1 Nov 2021 · source

The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and the Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency fully support the Commission’s high ambitions for a toxic-free environment leading to zero pollution. We want to thank the Commission for the possibility to provide feedback regarding the Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) on the revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulation.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.