Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

MAR
MARQUES

Company · United Kingdom

3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
5
positions filed
in those 583 files
0.5
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €10K+ a year · in the register since 2010

BUN
Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer

Industry association · Germany

9
files engaged
of 583 tracked
9
positions filed
in those 583 files
6.8
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €300K+ a year · in the register since 2011

Files both filed on (2)

Industrial property: legal protection of designs. Recast · Industrial property: protection of Community design

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Industrial property: legal protection of designs. Recast

MARQUES · filed 12 Jan 2021 · source

MARQUES is the European Association representing brand owners' interests. MARQUES (public ID number in the Transparency Register: 97131823590-44) is one of the current three signatories of the submitted joint contribution on the Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment on the Review of the Design Directive (the Directive) and Community Design Regulation (the Regulation), together with ECTA and INTA.

MARQUES · filed 12 Jan 2021 · source

MARQUES is the European Association representing brand owners' interests. MARQUES (public ID number in the Transparency Register: 97131823590-44) is one of the current three signatories of the submitted joint contribution on the Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment on the Review of the Design Directive (the Directive) and Community Design Regulation (the Regulation), together with ECTA and INTA.

Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer · filed 27 Jan 2023 · source

Please find the feedback of the Federal Bar Association attached. It is a joint feedback on the Directive (p. 3-6) and the Regulation (p. 6) with a common intro (p. 2-3) and common conclusions (p. 7). We want to upload this document as well as a feedback for Regulation. Please do not hesitate to get back to us if you have any questions. Many thanks.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

MARQUES · filed 31 Jan 2023 · source

MARQUES is the European Association representing the interest of brand owners in Europe and beyond. MARQUES has been involved in the debate on the reform of the European Union Design legislation since its inception, as ensued after the publication of the Legal Review on Industrial Designs Protection in Europe (the Review] in the year 2016.

Industrial property: protection of Community design

Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer · filed 27 Jan 2023 · source

Please find the feedback of the Federal Bar Association attached. It is a joint feedback on the Directive (p. 3-6) and the Regulation (p. 6) with a common intro (p. 2-3) and conclusions (p. 7). We want to upload this document as well as a feedback for Directive. Please do not hesitate to get back to us if you have any questions. Many thanks.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

MARQUES · filed 31 Jan 2023 · source

MARQUES is the European Association representing the interest of brand owners in Europe and beyond. MARQUES has been involved in the debate on the reform of the European Union Design legislation since its inception, as ensued after the publication of the Legal Review on Industrial Designs Protection in Europe (the Review] in the year 2016.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.