Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
NGO · Czechia
Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2011
Environmental organization · Belgium
Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2009
Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention · EU implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the area of access to justice in environmental matters
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Justice and Environment · filed 3 Apr 2020 · source
Comments of Association Justice and Environment, z.s. (J&E) on the Roadmap prepared by the European Commission titled “Access to justice in environmental matters”, Lead DG: DG ENV, E4 – Compliance & Better Regulation, also known as the Amendment of the Aarhus Regulation 3 April 2020 Introduction First and foremost, J&E welcomes the submission of the Roadmap and the initiative that the Aarhus Regulation (Regulation…
European Environmental Bureau · filed 3 Apr 2020 · source
Access to justice is a widespread problem in the Member States and has been woefully insufficient also at EU level, as was also found by the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee. Overall, the EEB welcomes the initiative by the Commission to finally address some of the deficiencies around access to justice, but would like to draw attention to certain aspects that are elaborated in the attached document.
European Environmental Bureau · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source
The EEB welcomes the fact that the Commission has published its proposal to amend the Aarhus Regulation, with its stated intention to widen the opportunities to review decisions by the EU institutions that harm the environment. The proposal addresses a major obstacle to access to justice, namely the limitation of acts that may be challenged to measures of individual scope.
Justice and Environment · filed 4 Jun 2018 · source
As the Roadmap states: “The EU is a Party to the (Aarhus) Convention and must adhere to its obligations.” Accordingly, after having been found in 2017 to be in noncompliance with article 9, paras. 3 and 4 of the Convention by the ACCC, the EU declared at the most recent Meeting of the Parties in Budva that it will "continue to explore ways and means to comply with the Aarhus Convention in a way that is compatible…
European Environmental Bureau · filed 5 Jun 2018 · source
Context: The description of the context is broadly accurate, though it fails to mention that the reason that no agreement was reached at the MoP was because the EU opposed the endorsement of the finding of non-compliance (thereby breaking the longstanding practice whereby all findings of non-compliance had previously been endorsed by the MoP with the full support of the EU) but failed to get even a single other…
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.