Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
1(1) Finland’s response to Commission’s public consultation – Clean corporate vehicles This paper presents Finland’s preliminary views concerning the options for EU actions to increase the demand for zero-emission vehicles in corporate fleets.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
SMEs are a driving force in Europe's mobility and transport economy. They play a key role in greening fleet operations, often adopting new technologies early on through leasing, rental, and shared mobility solutions. However, the European Commission's accelerated path towards a legislative proposal on zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) targets for corporate fleets risks undermining these efforts.
SMEs are a driving force in Europe's mobility and transport economy. They play a key role in greening fleet operations, often adopting new technologies early on through leasing, rental, and shared mobility solutions. However, the European Commission's accelerated path towards a legislative proposal on zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) targets for corporate fleets risks undermining these efforts.
Finland’s reply to the European Commission’s Call for Evidence on the revision of the framework for compulsory licensing of patents Finland thanks the European Commission for its position on the initiative to review the functioning of the compulsory licensing framework for patents. Finland considers it important to strengthen the EU’s crisis preparedness and resilience.
Filed in Finnish · English published by the European Commission
In principle, a lean, uniform, efficient system in the internal market is welcomed instead of a patchwork of 27 different procedures across Member States. If supply chains cannot offer the provision of necessary services and goods in case of crisis, regulatory instruments that can ensure this functioning are supported.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.