Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
NGO · Germany
NGO · Belgium
Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2010
Circular Economy Act · Sustainability requirements for batteries
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Facing Finance e.V. · filed 3 Nov 2025 · source
In different studies we have analyzed how financial market participants such as banks and ESG rating providers consider plastics and circularity, showing that they currently lack an integration of plastics criteria (https://www.facing-finance.org/en/2025/09/plastic-money-are-banks-turning-a-blind-eye-to-the-plastic-crisis/ …
ECOS · filed 5 Nov 2025 · source
ECOS welcomes the recognition that reducing the EUs dependency on raw materials, improving competitiveness, and mitigating environmental pressures requires a strong circular economy. We support proposals to expand Extended Producer Responsibility schemes, establish mandatory criteria for circular public procurement, and increase attention on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment, and hopefully on waste…
Facing Finance e.V. · filed 6 Feb 2019 · source
We welcome the initiative to introduce responsible sourcing standards for the production of batteries, as the minerals used for battery production can have a significant impact on the communities and the environment they are sourced from.
ECOS · filed 6 Feb 2019 · source
ECOS believes that at the EU should take action to reduce the environmental impact of batteries, using existing legislation and by introducing new legal instruments addressing all phases of the value chain, from (ethical) sourcing of raw materials to recovery. Regarding the policy options presented, ECOS considers that a combination of options 3, 4 and 5 would be appropriate.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.