Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

ECR
ECRE

NGO · Belgium

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
EDF
36
files engaged
of 583 tracked
40
positions filed
in those 583 files
19
declared FTE
self-declared
9
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €1.5M+ a year · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland · Asylum and migration management

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland

ECRE · filed 1 Feb 2022 · source

ECRE does not support the measures proposed, which will have an adverse effect on the right to asylum without adequately responding to the situation at the EU’s borders with Belarus. The main fundamental rights affected by the proposal are the right to human dignity (Article 1 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFREU)), the right to asylum (Article 18 CFREU), the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading…

European Disability Forum · filed 3 Feb 2022 · source

The European Disability Forum (EDF) considers that Proposal for a Council Decision does not sufficiently take into account the rights and needs of persons with disabilities and do not fully comply with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) ratified by the EU and all its Member States, including Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.

Asylum and migration management

European Disability Forum · filed 8 Mar 2021 · source

The regulation should refer to the CRPD. Preamble (pmbl.) 43, art. 12 (4) and 13 (4d): as written in art. 7 CRPD, children with disabilities should be provided with disability and age-appropriate assistance to express their views on matters affecting them, including during the personal interview and upon assessing the best interests of the child. Pmbl 44, art. 13 (4) and 24: should refer to art.

ECRE · filed 11 Mar 2021 · source

Like Dublin IV before it, the overall approach of the Regulation on asylum and migration management (RAMM) to responsibility allocation is to maintain the status quo but add “corrective” solidarity mechanisms intended to compensate for the outcomes of the standard rules and make them fairer. A deeper overhaul of the criteria on sharing of responsibility is vital to address the system’s dysfunctionalities.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.