Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
ECRE does not support the measures proposed, which will have an adverse effect on the right to asylum without adequately responding to the situation at the EU’s borders with Belarus. The main fundamental rights affected by the proposal are the right to human dignity (Article 1 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFREU)), the right to asylum (Article 18 CFREU), the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading…
The European Disability Forum (EDF) considers that Proposal for a Council Decision does not sufficiently take into account the rights and needs of persons with disabilities and do not fully comply with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) ratified by the EU and all its Member States, including Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.
The regulation should refer to the CRPD. Preamble (pmbl.) 43, art. 12 (4) and 13 (4d): as written in art. 7 CRPD, children with disabilities should be provided with disability and age-appropriate assistance to express their views on matters affecting them, including during the personal interview and upon assessing the best interests of the child. Pmbl 44, art. 13 (4) and 24: should refer to art.
Like Dublin IV before it, the overall approach of the Regulation on asylum and migration management (RAMM) to responsibility allocation is to maintain the status quo but add “corrective” solidarity mechanisms intended to compensate for the outcomes of the standard rules and make them fairer. A deeper overhaul of the criteria on sharing of responsibility is vital to address the system’s dysfunctionalities.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.