Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ECR

ECRE

NGO · Belgium

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track ECRE in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at ECRE? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files ECRE engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from ECRE or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

ECRE filed 2 positions between 11 Mar 2021 and 1 Feb 2022, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed

What they argued

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Polandfiled 1 Feb 2022PDFsource

ECRE does not support the measures proposed, which will have an adverse effect on the right to asylum without adequately responding to the situation at the EU’s borders with Belarus. The main fundamental rights affected by the proposal are the right to human dignity (Article 1 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFREU)), the right to asylum (Article 18 CFREU), the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading…

Asylum and migration managementfiled 11 Mar 2021PDFsource

Like Dublin IV before it, the overall approach of the Regulation on asylum and migration management (RAMM) to responsibility allocation is to maintain the status quo but add “corrective” solidarity mechanisms intended to compensate for the outcomes of the standard rules and make them fairer. A deeper overhaul of the criteria on sharing of responsibility is vital to address the system’s dysfunctionalities.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put ECRE next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from ECRE’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.