Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

EAR
Earthsight

NGO · United Kingdom

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
3.2
declared FTE
self-declared
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2020

34
files engaged
of 583 tracked
36
positions filed
in those 583 files
28.5
declared FTE
self-declared
16
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2008

Files both filed on (2)

Delegated Regulation amending Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 (EU Deforestation Regulation) · Illegal logging – evaluation of EU rules (fitness check)

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Delegated Regulation amending Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 (EU Deforestation Regulation)

Earthsight · filed 13 May 2025 · source

Earthsight submits the comments below to the European Commissions public consultation on the amendment of Annex I to the Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). This amending act is intended to provide technical fixes and clarifications and should not be used to relitigate the scope of commodities covered by the Regulation.

WWF European Policy Office · filed 13 May 2025 · source

The proposed approach to maintain the initial list of relevant commodities and products in the EUDR scope and to exclude certain products only on the basis that they are not made of relevant commodities will support the implementation of the legislation.

Illegal logging – evaluation of EU rules (fitness check)

Earthsight · filed 28 Feb 2020 · source

The European Union Timber Regulation is a pioneering piece of legislation and remains a vital tool in the global fight against illegal deforestation and the associated trade in commodities. While there have been laudable steps taken by a few Member States to enforce this law over the years, these instances have remained the exception rather than the rule.

WWF European Policy Office · filed 28 Feb 2020 · source

WWF feedback The intention of both the EUTR and the FLEGT regulation is to fight illegal logging and related trade. A fitness check of the regulations therefore needs to address this overarching objective thoroughly and equally from an economic, social and environmental perspective. EUTR Apparently the fitness check will mainly focus on the implementation of the EUTR over the last years.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.