Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Considering that the directive imposed the obligation to ensure that access to any victim support services is not dependent on a victim making a formal complaint with regard to a criminal offence to a competent authority, we believe that it would be useful for the future instrument to pay special attention to explaining how the term is understood and used in the extrajudicial procedures to which it refers to.
The Bundesverband ANUAS e.V. warmly welcomes the initiative to improve the situation of victims. With the attached contribution, ANUAS hopes to provide extensive guidance, from the perspective of the persons concerned, in order to make the EU Directive more concrete and thus enable victims to have better access to their rights. Thank you very much for the possibility of participating in this initiative.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Bundesverband ANUAS e.V. — Victim Support Institution reports in annex on the experience of judicial cooperation. The creation of an EU legal framework is highly appreciated. The effectiveness, efficiency and legal certainty for victims is welcomed. We would like to thank you very much for the good efforts and offer our experience and skills and are happy to contribute to the creation of future solutions.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Latvian courts support the objective of the initiative to establish common rules to facilitate the transfer of criminal proceedings between the competent authorities of the Member States, pointing out that, prima facie, this framework could be best achieved through option 3.
Filed in Latvian · English published by the European Commission
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.