Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Amnesty International welcomes the DMA’s focus on levelling the playing field and addressing the dominant role of gatekeepers over the online environment. However, Amnesty believes the DMA should put more focus on end-users and be more ambitious to allow competitors to the gatekeepers to emerge that offer more choice and better conditions to end-users. 1.
We strongly call on the European co-legislators to ensure accessibility of digital platforms and services, so that European law best serves the interest of all Union citizens, including of more than 100 million EU citizens with disabilities. The explanatory memorandums for the Proposals make references to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and mention social sustainability.
Amnesty International is strongly critical of the European Commission for the decision to appease the violations committed by the Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, instead of following up with a prompt and robust infringement process to uphold EU law, as mandated under the Treaties.
The European Disability Forum (EDF) considers that Proposal for a Council Decision does not sufficiently take into account the rights and needs of persons with disabilities and do not fully comply with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) ratified by the EU and all its Member States, including Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.