Some industries covered by the CBAM mechanism have already fulfilled their carbon emission obligations in the national carbon market or sub-national carbon markets. To better align with existing carbon market mechanisms, it is recommended that carbon prices from both national and sub-national carbon markets be included in the scope of carbon price deduction under CBAM.
CQC
China Quality Certification Centre Co., Ltd.
Company · CHN
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track China in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at China Quality Certification Centre Co., Ltd.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
China Quality Certification Centre Co., Ltd. filed 2 positions on 24 Sept 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
1.Include Emissions from Purchased Thermal Energy in the Scope of Indirect Emission Accounting It is recommended that carbon emissions from purchased thermal energy be included in the scope of indirect emission accounting. This aligns with existing international practices and helps enterprises manage carbon emissions more efficiently while complying with other carbon emission management rules.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put China Quality Certification Centre Co., Ltd. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 80.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from China Quality Certification Centre Co., Ltd.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.