CECE - the Committee for European Construction Equipment - fully supports the European Commissions objective to simplify and streamline the EU digital regulatory framework, ensuring it fosters innovation, competitiveness, and legal certainty across the Single Market.
CCE
CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 60534525900-25
10
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
10
legislative files
of 665 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1519 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #363 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.7
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since
Declares membership of
- CEN
- Orgalim
- Construction 2050 Alliance
- EIT Raw Materials →
- European Forum for Manufacturing
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track CECE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment filed 10 positions between 18 Dec 2017 and 23 Jan 2026, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
2017 · 1 filed2020 · 1 filed2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed2025 · 4 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
CECE welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment on a proposal for a legal act laying down requirements for Artificial Intelligence. Regarding the different policy options proposed, we would like to share the following comments: - POLICY OPTION 1 For the construction machinery sector, we do not see any benefits of additional requirements for AI-enhanced subsystems in…
CECE, the Committee for European Construction Equipment, welcomes the European Commissions proposal for a Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). Although the risk of cybersecurity incidents has increased over recent years given the multiplication of connected products on the market and technological changes, CECE wishes to stress that, even today, the construction equipment sector is already committed to assessing the level of…
CECE Input Key Challenges in the Standardisation Process CECE welcomes the opportunity to provide preliminary input to the European Commissions Call for Evidence in preparation for the impact assessment on the revision of the standardisation system.
CECE welcomes the proposal on the Regulation on machinery products COM(2021) 202 which we hope will bring further legal clarity We fully support the alignment with the New Legislative Framework (NLF) as it brings coherence with the other legislative acts and horizontal transparency.
The Committee for European Construction Equipment (CECE) represents the interests of European construction equipment manufacturers. Through its national member associations, CECE speaks on behalf of an industry comprising approximately 1,200 companies, employing around 300,000 people and generating an annual turnover of 60 billion.
CECE welcomes the chance to respond to the call for evidence regarding the current evaluation of the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) and the Simple Pressure Vessels Directive (SPVD). We believe the PED and SPVD are fit for purpose and recommend against merging them. Maintaining their distinction is crucial for clarity and the prevention of unnecessary disruption to existing compliance mechanisms.
The Committee for European Construction Equipment (CECE) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the newly proposed restrictions under Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). Manufacturers of construction equipment require greater clarity regarding the scope and applicability of the proposed exemptions restrictions for substances such as Dechlorane Plus, UV-328, Medium-Chain Chlorinated…
The Committee for European Construction Equipment (CECE) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the newly proposed restrictions under Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). Manufacturers of construction equipment require greater clarity regarding the scope and applicability of the proposed exemptions restrictions for substances such as Dechlorane Plus, UV-328, Medium-Chain Chlorinated…
CECE, the Committee for European Construction Equipment, welcomes the initiative of the Commission to fill one of the remaining gaps in the single market: the harmonisation of technical requirements related to road circulation aspects of mobile machinery. Please find the CECE feedback attached.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 213.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.