CECE Input Key Challenges in the Standardisation Process CECE welcomes the opportunity to provide preliminary input to the European Commissions Call for Evidence in preparation for the impact assessment on the revision of the standardisation system.
CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 60534525900-25
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #315 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- CEN
- Orgalim →
- Construction 2050 Alliance
- EIT Raw Materials →
- European Forum for Manufacturing
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track CECE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment filed 5 positions between 20 Jun 2024 and 23 Jan 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The Committee for European Construction Equipment (CECE) represents the interests of European construction equipment manufacturers. Through its national member associations, CECE speaks on behalf of an industry comprising approximately 1,200 companies, employing around 300,000 people and generating an annual turnover of 60 billion.
CECE welcomes the chance to respond to the call for evidence regarding the current evaluation of the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) and the Simple Pressure Vessels Directive (SPVD). We believe the PED and SPVD are fit for purpose and recommend against merging them. Maintaining their distinction is crucial for clarity and the prevention of unnecessary disruption to existing compliance mechanisms.
The Committee for European Construction Equipment (CECE) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the newly proposed restrictions under Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). Manufacturers of construction equipment require greater clarity regarding the scope and applicability of the proposed exemptions restrictions for substances such as Dechlorane Plus, UV-328, Medium-Chain Chlorinated…
The Committee for European Construction Equipment (CECE) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the newly proposed restrictions under Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). Manufacturers of construction equipment require greater clarity regarding the scope and applicability of the proposed exemptions restrictions for substances such as Dechlorane Plus, UV-328, Medium-Chain Chlorinated…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Japan Business Council in Europe · 3 files in common
- ACEA · 3 files in common
- VDMA · 3 files in common
- MedTech Europe · 3 files in common
- CLEPA European Association of Automotive Suppliers · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 19.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from CECE - Committee for European Construction Equipment’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.