NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 199558248466-17
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #382 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track BIPAVER in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at BIPAVER EEIG? so we know who speaks for it.
BIPAVER EEIG filed 4 positions between 30 Apr 2025 and 27 Mar 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Opinion on the European Commission’s planned Circular Economy Act (Bureau International Permanent des Associates de Vendeurs et Rechapeurs de Pneumatiques) represents the independent European retreading industry.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
BIPAVER (Bureau International Permanent des Associations de Vendeurs et Rechapeurs de Pneumatiques), the association representing the independent European Retreading Industry, welcome the proposed amendments regarding retreaded tyres.
BIPAVER (Bureau International Permanent des Associations de Vendeurs et Rechapeurs de Pneumatiques), the association representing the independent European Retreading Industry, welcome the proposed amendments regarding retreaded tyres.
Please note: Due to the fact that the feedback given here cannot be formated please look at the attached document for a better understanding of the feedback. BIPAVER, representing the independent European Retreading and Tyre Trade Industry, welcomes the intention of the European Commission to clarify the EUDR regulation regarding its application to used and retreaded tyres.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 221.
Everything on this page comes from BIPAVER EEIG’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.