Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
BIO

BioForum

NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 384969411804-94

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #719 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2013
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Lid van IFOAM EU, Europese koepel voor de biologische sector die lobbywerk op Europees niveau coördineert.

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Antwerpen, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track BioForum in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow BioForum

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at BioForum? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

BioForum filed 2 positions between 17 Nov 2025 and 19 Mar 2026, across 1 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Amending certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countriesfiled 19 Mar 2026source

Bioforum appreciates several proposed amendments. In particular, we welcome the Commissions proposal regarding the veterinary withdrawal period. We also welcome the proposal to simplify rules on group certification. Nevertheless, we recommend retaining the current 2% rule regarding certification costs in relation to organic turnover as the costs of certification can exceed this limit.

Amending certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countriesfiled 17 Nov 2025source

BioForum welcomes the Commissions initiative to safeguard international trade relations by providing clarity about organic goods imported under the equivalence scheme and by postponing the deadline to conclude on new trade agreements. We also appreciate the Commissions intention to reduce unnecessary burdens and simplify the organic regulatory framework.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put BioForum next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from BioForum’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.