Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
BA

Beiersdorf AG

Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 89804672520-02

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #263 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
3
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Beiersdorf is on the EU level directly member of the following associations or other networks of stakeholder:
  • AIM - European Brands Association (https://www.aimglobal.org/aim-europe/)
  • Cosmetics Europe (https://cosmeticseurope.com/)
  • EPAA - The European Partnership on Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.…
  • EcoBeautyScore consortium (https://www.ecobeautyscore.com/)
  • Europen (https://www.europen-packaging.eu/)
  • Value of Beauty (https://valueofbeauty.com/)

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Registered as
Beiersdorf
Head office
Hamburg, Germany

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Beiersdorf in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Beiersdorf AG? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Beiersdorf AG engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from Beiersdorf AG or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Beiersdorf AG filed 3 positions between 2 Apr 2024 and 26 Nov 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2024 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed

What they argued

Simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and the list of Union harmonisation legislationfiled 2 Oct 2025PDFsource

As a major German manufacturer specializing in wound care medical devices we welcome the Commission's initiative to streamline the regulatory framework while maintaining high safety standards. We fully support the BVMed/VDGH Whitepaper Future Development of the MDR and IVDR regarding the urgent need for MDR/IVDR revision, especially the need for better predictability and timely feedback from Notified Bodies.

Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsfiled 2 Apr 2024PDFsource

Currently, various agencies and scientific committees provide advice and risk assessment to the Commission due to the diverse uses of substances and chemicals, leading to different laws and agencies responsible for their assessment. This approach of conducting risk assessments under specific legislation makes sense but can result in conflicts when the hazard assessment is not aligned or conducted simultaneously.

European Chemicals Agency and amending regulationsfiled 26 Nov 2025source

As part of the European Commissions initiative to establish a Basic Regulation for the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), we wish to express our strong support for maintaining the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) as an independent, sector-specific expert body within the future structure of ECHA.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 25.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Beiersdorf AG’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.