Industry association · Germany · EU Transparency Register 166921329014-91
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #594 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since
Declares membership of
International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM)
www.ifoam.bio
IFOAM Organics Europe (IFOAM OE), www.organicseurope.bio
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
BÖLW filed 3 positions between 18 Nov 2025 and 24 Aug 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
The BÖLW, the umbrella organisation for the organic sector in Germany, welcomes the proposal made by the European Commission on 16 Proposal presented in December 2025 to open up the Basic Organic Regulation 2018/848, as it is limited to a few targeted amendments and addresses important concerns of the organic sector.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
BÖLW, the German Organic umbrella organization is grateful for the consultation on Organic Regulation and is pleased to provide feedback for a targeted opening of the Basic Regulation (EU) 2018/848. We also provide an impact assessment for the focussed amendments. Please find our input in the files enclosed (file 1: statement; file 2: impact assessment).
Stellungnahme Zum Entwurf der Durchführungsverordnung – Ares (2026)7374948 zu Hochrisikoprodukten Der BÖLW begrüßt grundsätzlich eine risikoorientierte Bio-Kontrolle. Allerdings kritisieren wir, dass die Kriterien für die Festlegung von Hochrisikoprodukten nicht transparent und auch nicht sachlich nachvollziehbar sind. Das ist aber der entscheidende Punkt für eine Risikobewertung.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from BÖLW’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.