Industry association · France · EU Transparency Register 716151547819-39
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #147 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ANOP in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ANOP? so we know who speaks for it.
ANOP filed 4 positions between 28 Aug 2023 and 6 Feb 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
The National Association of Producer Organisations (ANOP) welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to strengthen ocean governance by drawing up a European Ocean Act, as part of the European Ocean Pact adopted in 2025.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
French and European fisheries have for more than ten years undertaken considerable efforts to reconcile sustainability, environmental performance and food supply. Yet, the European Commission’s current vision appears to be disconnected from the realities on the ground, ignoring socio-economic constraints, competition for maritime space and the effects of climate change.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The National Sociation of Producer Organisations (ANOP) drew attention to the successive crises that had profoundly affected fishing undertakings, seriously jeopardising their activities, both economically and in biological terms (impact of climate change and anthropogenic pressures on species).
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The National Association of Producer Organisations (ANOP) is in favour of this evaluation and analysis and wishes to reiterate the need for (i) consistency between the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the EU’s trade policy; (II) compliance with a fair competition framework between import products and EU products; (III) a more ambitious retrospective analysis than the one proposed.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ANOP next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 9.
Everything on this page comes from ANOP’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.